You have options in enrichment methods for targeted sequencing. How does Xdrop™ compare to other commercial solutions?
On average, other enrichment methods use 10–1000 times more input DNA than Xdrop™
From assay design to sequencing results, alternatives to Xdrop™ take on average 5 times longer
Xdrop™ stands alone in its use of a completely different strategy to capture target fragments of DNA
Targeted Locus Amplification (TLA)A technique that leverages cross-linking between adjacent sequences to generate complex DNA libraries. The design and implementation is challenging and time-consuming.
CRISPR-Cas9 SystemsUses RNA-guided engineering nucleases to isolate targeted DNA fragments. Requires a large amount of input DNA and achieves moderate enrichment.
Region Specific Extraction (RSE)Target molecules are captures with a large selection of oligos. The right constellation of oligos can be very difficult to optimize.
Xdrop™ vs. Hybridization Capture – comparable outcomes, complementary uses
Our benchmarking study shows that Xdrop™ is an agile platform that allows you to easily switch from one target to another and explore each in depth, with a very even coverage, easily spanning across repeats and GC-rich regions. Take a look at our data.
10 simple steps to insight
A world of possibilities
ContactMileparken 282730 HerlevDenmark
firstname.lastname@example.orgPhone: (+45) 82 30 45 00
CVR 32 30 93 21
Connect with us
2019 Samplix ApS. All rights reserved. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.